↓ Skip to main content

Poets of Promotion: Corporate Personality and Crowd Psychology in Guy Thorne and Leo Custance’s Sharks (1904)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Victorian Culture, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Poets of Promotion: Corporate Personality and Crowd Psychology in Guy Thorne and Leo Custance’s Sharks (1904)
Published in
Journal of Victorian Culture, June 2020
DOI 10.1093/jvcult/vcaa017
Authors

Jakob Gaardbo Nielsen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,662,717
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Victorian Culture
#194
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,184
of 398,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Victorian Culture
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.