↓ Skip to main content

Costs and Mortality Associated With Multidrug-Resistant Healthcare-Associated Acinetobacter Infections

Overview of attention for article published in Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Costs and Mortality Associated With Multidrug-Resistant Healthcare-Associated Acinetobacter Infections
Published in
Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), July 2016
DOI 10.1017/ice.2016.145
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

BACKGROUND Our objective was to estimate the per-infection and cumulative mortality and cost burden of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in the United States using data from published studies. METHODS We identified studies that estimated the excess cost, length of stay (LOS), or mortality attributable to MDR Acinetobacter HAIs. We generated estimates of the cost per HAI using 3 methods: (1) overall cost estimates, (2) multiplying LOS estimates by a cost per inpatient-day ($4,350) from the payer perspective, and (3) multiplying LOS estimates by a cost per inpatient-day from the hospital ($2,030) perspective. We deflated our estimates for time-dependent bias using an adjustment factor derived from studies that estimated attributable LOS using both time-fixed methods and either multistate models (70.4% decrease) or matching patients with and without HAIs using the timing of infection (47.4% decrease). Finally, we used the incidence rate of MDR Acinetobacter HAIs to generate cumulative incidence, cost, and mortality associated with these infections. RESULTS Our estimates of the cost per infection were $129,917 (method 1), $72,025 (method 2), and $33,510 (method 3). The pooled relative risk of mortality was 4.51 (95% CI, 1.10-32.65), which yielded a mortality rate of 10.6% (95% CI, 2.5%-29.4%). With an incidence rate of 0.141 (95% CI, 0.136-0.161) per 1,000 patient-days at risk, we estimated an annual cumulative incidence of 12,524 (95% CI, 11,509-13,625) in the United States. CONCLUSION The estimates presented here are relevant to understanding the expenditures and lives that could be saved by preventing MDR Acinetobacter HAIs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1-7.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 10 13%
Other 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 25 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 8%
Chemistry 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 34 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#24,079,402
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#5,318
of 6,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,232
of 336,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#521
of 546 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 546 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.