↓ Skip to main content

Transformational leadership in nursing: towards a more critical interpretation

Overview of attention for article published in Nursing Inquiry, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
604 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transformational leadership in nursing: towards a more critical interpretation
Published in
Nursing Inquiry, October 2012
DOI 10.1111/nin.12006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Effective nurse leadership is positioned as an essential factor in achieving optimal patient outcomes and workplace enhancement. Over the last two decades, writing and research on nursing leadership has been dominated by one conceptual theory, that of transformational leadership. This theoretical framework has provided insight into various leader characteristics, with research findings presented as persuasive evidence. While elsewhere there has been robust debate on the merits of the transformational model of leadership, in the nursing literature, there has been little critical review of the model and the commonly used assessment instruments. In this article, we critically review more than a decade of nursing scholarship on the transformational model of leadership and its empirical evidence. Applying a critical lens to the literature, the conceptual and methodological weaknesses of much nursing research on this topic, we question whether the uncritical adoption of the transformational model has resulted in a limited interpretation of nursing leadership. Given the limitations of the model, we advocate embracing new ways of thinking about nursing leadership.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 604 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Trinidad and Tobago 1 <1%
Namibia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 592 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 145 24%
Student > Bachelor 103 17%
Student > Postgraduate 43 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 5%
Other 75 12%
Unknown 169 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 199 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 86 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 42 7%
Social Sciences 34 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 2%
Other 60 10%
Unknown 169 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,987,811
of 34,226,562 outputs
Outputs from Nursing Inquiry
#146
of 775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,533
of 229,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nursing Inquiry
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,226,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them