↓ Skip to main content

CD34+ cells obtained from “good mobilizers” are more activated and exhibit lower ex vivo expansion efficiency than their counterparts from “poor mobilizers”

Overview of attention for article published in Transfusion, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CD34+ cells obtained from “good mobilizers” are more activated and exhibit lower ex vivo expansion efficiency than their counterparts from “poor mobilizers”
Published in
Transfusion, October 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02436.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zoran Ivanovic, Milica Kovacevic‐Filipovic, Michel Jeanne, Leslie Ardilouze, Anne Bertot, Milène Szyporta, Francis Hermitte, Xavier Lafarge, Pascale Duchez, Marija Vlaski, Noel Milpied, Mirjana Pavlovic, Vincent Praloran, Jean‐Michel Boiron

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 43%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Transfusion
#1,671
of 4,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,652
of 106,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transfusion
#27
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.