↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Priming Vaccination With Influenza Virus H5 Hemagglutinin Antigen Significantly Increases the Duration of T cell Responses Induced by a Heterologous H5 Booster Vaccination
Published in
Journal of Infectious Diseases, July 2016
DOI 10.1093/infdis/jiw310
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

 H5N1 and other avian influenza strains represent major pandemic threats. Like all influenza A strains, H5N1 viruses evolve rapidly. Innovative immunization strategies are needed to induce cross-protective immunity.  Subjects primed with Clade 1 H5 antigen, with or without adjuvant, and H5 naïve individuals were boosted with Clade 2 H5 antigen. The impact of priming on T cells capable of both proliferation and cytokine production after antigen restimulation was assessed.  Subjects previously vaccinated with Clade 1 H5 antigen developed significantly enhanced Clade 2 H5 cross-reactive T cell responses detectable 6 months post-vaccination with Clade 2 H5 antigen. Priming dose (15 µg vs. 45 or 90 µg) had no effect on magnitude of heterotypic H5 T cell responses. In contrast, age at priming negatively modulated both magnitude and duration of heterotypic H5 T cell responses. Elderly subjects developed significantly less heterotypic H5 T cell boosting, predominantly for T cells capable of cytokine production. Adjuvant had a positive albeit weaker effect than age. Magnitude of CD4+ IFN-γ producing T cells correlated with H5 antibody responses.  H5 heterotypic priming prior to onset of an H5N1 pandemic may increase magnitude and duration of immunity against a newly drifted pandemic H5 virus.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Student > Master 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,728,651
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#6,591
of 18,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,597
of 336,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#57
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.