↓ Skip to main content

In vitro analysis of PNIPAAm–PEG, a novel, injectable scaffold for spinal cord repair

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Biomaterialia, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
In vitro analysis of PNIPAAm–PEG, a novel, injectable scaffold for spinal cord repair
Published in
Acta Biomaterialia, October 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.10.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 92 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 27%
Student > Master 14 15%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 24 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Chemistry 7 7%
Materials Science 6 6%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,194,606
of 33,254,694 outputs
Outputs from Acta Biomaterialia
#1,498
of 5,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,693
of 140,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Biomaterialia
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,254,694 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.