↓ Skip to main content

Control of Biogenic Amines in Food—Existing and Emerging Approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Food Science, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
5 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
505 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Control of Biogenic Amines in Food—Existing and Emerging Approaches
Published in
Journal of Food Science, September 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01774.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Biogenic amines have been reported in a variety of foods, such as fish, meat, cheese, vegetables, and wines. They are described as low molecular weight organic bases with aliphatic, aromatic, and heterocyclic structures. The most common biogenic amines found in foods are histamine, tyramine, cadaverine, 2-phenylethylamine, spermine, spermidine, putrescine, tryptamine, and agmatine. In addition octopamine and dopamine have been found in meat and meat products and fish. The formation of biogenic amines in food by the microbial decarboxylation of amino acids can result in consumers suffering allergic reactions, characterized by difficulty in breathing, itching, rash, vomiting, fever, and hypertension. Traditionally, biogenic amine formation in food has been prevented, primarily by limiting microbial growth through chilling and freezing. However, for many fishing based subsistence populations, such measures are not practical. Therefore, secondary control measures to prevent biogenic amine formation in foods or to reduce their levels once formed need to be considered as alternatives. Such approaches to limit microbial growth may include hydrostatic pressures, irradiation, controlled atmosphere packaging, or the use of food additives. Histamine may potentially be degraded by the use of bacterial amine oxidase or amine-negative bacteria. Only some will be cost-effective and practical for use in subsistence populations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 505 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 496 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 66 13%
Student > Master 62 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 11%
Researcher 52 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 4%
Other 87 17%
Unknown 161 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 25%
Chemistry 57 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 3%
Engineering 17 3%
Other 68 13%
Unknown 186 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2025.
All research outputs
#1,936,985
of 33,834,589 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Food Science
#252
of 7,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,404
of 149,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Food Science
#6
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,834,589 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.