↓ Skip to main content

Seasonal Patterns of Abdominal Pain Consultations Among Adults and Children

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Seasonal Patterns of Abdominal Pain Consultations Among Adults and Children
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, March 2013
DOI 10.1097/mpg.0b013e3182769796
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Consultations for chronic abdominal pain are frequent in adults and children. A seasonal pattern of abdominal pain consultations with winter predominance was shown in previous pediatric studies; however, no studies have investigated whether such a pattern exists in adult patients. Understanding the differences in seasonal patterns of abdominal pain consultations among adults and children may indicate that either different mechanisms exist for common chronic pain conditions or triggering factors may vary by age. The aim of the study was to investigate whether a seasonal variation in abdominal pain consultation patterns exists among adults and children.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Student > Master 8 19%
Researcher 8 19%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Psychology 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2015.
All research outputs
#21,287,852
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#5,044
of 7,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,910
of 240,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#35
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.