↓ Skip to main content

Embolia Gasosa Venosa Inadvertida Durante Cesariana: Bolsas Retráteis para Líquidos Intravenosos sem Saídas Autovedantes Oferecem Riscos. Relato de Caso

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct), July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Embolia Gasosa Venosa Inadvertida Durante Cesariana: Bolsas Retráteis para Líquidos Intravenosos sem Saídas Autovedantes Oferecem Riscos. Relato de Caso
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct), July 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.bjan.2012.09.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mefkur Bakan, Ufuk Topuz, Asim Esen, Gokcen Basaranoglu, Erdogan Ozturk

Abstract

The anesthesiologist must be aware of the causes, diagnosis and treatment of venous air embolism and adopt the practice patterns to prevent its occurrence. Although venous air embolism is a known complication of cesarean section, we describe an unusual inattention that causes iatrogenic near fatal venous air embolism during a cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. One of the reasons for using self-collapsible intravenous (IV) infusion bags instead of conventional glass or plastic bottles is to take precaution against air embolism. We also demonstrated the risk of air embolism for two kinds of plastic collapsible intravenous fluid bags: polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polypropylene-based. Fluid bags without self-sealing outlets pose a risk for air embolism if the closed system is broken down, while the flexibility of the bag limits the amount of air entry. PVC-based bags, which have more flexibility, have significantly less risk of air entry when IV administration set is disconnected from the outlet. Using a pressure bag for rapid infusion can be dangerous without checking and emptying all air from the IV bag.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%