↓ Skip to main content

Anesthesia for ex utero intrapartum treatment: renewed insight on a rare procedure

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anesthesia for ex utero intrapartum treatment: renewed insight on a rare procedure
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.12.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel Vieira Marques, João Carneiro, Marta Adriano, Filipa Lança

Abstract

The ex utero intrapartum treatment is a rare surgical procedure performed in cases of expected postpartum fetal airway obstruction. The technique lies on a safe establishment of a patent airway during labor in anticipation of a critical respiratory event, without interrupting maternal-fetal circulation. Anesthetic management is substantially different from that regarding standard cesarean delivery and its main goals include uterine relaxation, fetal anesthesia and preservation of placental blood flow. We present the case of an ex utero intrapartum treatment procedure performed on a fetus with a large cervical lymphangioma and prenatal evidence of airway compromise. Modifications to the classic ex utero intrapartum treatment management strategies were successfully adopted and will be discussed in the following report.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Postgraduate 4 16%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 6 24%