↓ Skip to main content

Digital block with or without the addition of epinephrine in the anesthetic solution

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Digital block with or without the addition of epinephrine in the anesthetic solution
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.12.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Almiro dos Reis Júnior, Denise Quinto

Abstract

Review of various techniques for digital blocks with local anesthetic, with or without epinephrine. Description of various procedures and comparison of results reported in the literature, mainly on latency and quality of anesthesia, details on vasoconstrictor effect of epinephrine, intraoperative bleeding, necessity of tourniquet use, duration of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, blood flow and digital SpO2 behavior, local and systemic complications, and also approaches and drugs to be used in certain situations of ischemia. The advantages of adding epinephrine to the anesthetic solution are minor when compared to the risks of the procedure, and it seems dangerous to use a vasoconstrictor in the fingers, unless the safety of the technique and the possibility of discarding the tourniquet are definitely proven.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 22%
Student > Postgraduate 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Design 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 34%