↓ Skip to main content

Anatomical basis for sciatic nerve block at the knee level

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anatomical basis for sciatic nerve block at the knee level
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.03.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabiano Timbó Barbosa, Tatiana Rosa Bezerra Wanderley Barbosa, Rafael Martins da Cunha, Amanda Karine Barros Rodrigues, Fernando Wagner da Silva Ramos, Célio Fernando de Sousa-Rodrigues

Abstract

Recently, administration of sciatic nerve block has been revised due to the potential benefit for postoperative analgesia and patient satisfaction after the advent of ultrasound. The aim of this study was to describe the anatomical relations of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa to determine the optimal distance the needle must be positioned in order to realize the sciatic nerve block anterior to its bifurcation into the tibial and common fibular nerve. The study was conducted by dissection of human cadavers' popliteal fossa, fixed in 10% formalin, from the Laboratory of Human Anatomy and Morphology Departments of the Universidade Federal de Alagoas and Universidade de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas. Access to the sciatic nerve was obtained. 44 popliteal fossa were analyzed. The bifurcation of the sciatic nerve in relation to the apex of the fossa was observed. There was bifurcation in: 67.96% below the apex, 15.90% above the apex, 11.36% near the apex, and 4.78% in the gluteal region. The sciatic nerve bifurcation to its branches occurs at various levels, and the chance to succeed when the needle is placed between 5 and 7cm above the popliteal is 95.22%.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 20%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 8 32%