↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of interscalene brachial plexus block and intra-articular local anesthetic administration on postoperative pain management in arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of interscalene brachial plexus block and intra-articular local anesthetic administration on postoperative pain management in arthroscopic shoulder surgery
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.06.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Recep Aksu, Cihangir Biçer, Ayşe Ülgey, Adnan Bayram, Işın Güneş, Ahmet Güney, Mustafa Denizhan Yıldırım, Günhan Gökahmetoğlu, Karamehmet Yıldız

Abstract

In this study, the aim was to compare postoperative analgesia effects of the administration of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block and intra-articular bupivacaine carried out with bupivacaine. In the first group of patients 20mL 0.25% bupivacaine and ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISPB) were applied, while 20mL 0.25% bupivacaine was given via intra-articular (IA) administration to the second group patients after surgery. Patients in the third group were considered the control group and no block was performed. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine was used in all three groups for postoperative analgesia. In the ISPB group, morphine consumption in the periods between 0-4, 6-12 and 12-24 postoperative hours and total consumption within 24h was lower than in the other two groups. Morphine consumption in the IA group was lower than in the control group in the period from 0 to 6h and the same was true for total morphine consumption in 24h. Postoperative VASr scores in the ISPB group were lower than both of the other groups in the first 2h and lower than the control group in the 4th and 6th hours (p<0.05). In the IA group, VASr and VASm scores in the 2nd, 4th and 6th hours were lower than in the control group (p<0.05). Interscalene brachial plexus block was found to be more effective than intra-articular local anesthetic injection for postoperative analgesia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 20 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unknown 22 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,505,156
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition)
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,103
of 280,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them