↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of cricoid pressure application: anaesthetic trainee doctors vs. nursing anaesthetic assistants

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of cricoid pressure application: anaesthetic trainee doctors vs. nursing anaesthetic assistants
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.10.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nurul Haizam Yahaya, Rufinah Teo, Azarinah Izaham, Shereen Tang, Aliza Mohamad Yusof, Norsidah Abdul Manap

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Librarian 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 8 23%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Psychology 3 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#21,157,205
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition)
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,992
of 313,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition)
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them