↓ Skip to main content

Erector spinae plane block vs. paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), May 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Erector spinae plane block vs. paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition), May 2026
DOI 10.1016/j.bjane.2026.844767
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2026.
All research outputs
#22,543,978
of 34,151,718 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition)
#152
of 361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,329
of 360,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English edition)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,151,718 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 361 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them