↓ Skip to main content

Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization for autologous transplantation – a literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Hematology Transfusion and Cell Therapy, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization for autologous transplantation – a literature review
Published in
Hematology Transfusion and Cell Therapy, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bjhh.2015.07.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Aurélio Salvino, Jefferson Ruiz

Abstract

The use of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous support of hematopoietic progenitor cells is an effective strategy to treat various hematologic neoplasms, such as non-Hodgkin lymphomas and multiple myeloma. Mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells are the main source of support for autologous transplants, and collection of an adequate number of hematopoietic progenitor cells is a critical step in the autologous transplant procedure. Traditional strategies, based on the use of growth factors with or without chemotherapy, have limitations even when remobilizations are performed. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is the most widely used agent for progenitor cell mobilization. The association of plerixafor, a C-X-C Chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) inhibitor, to granulocyte colony stimulating factor generates rapid mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells. A literature review was performed of randomized studies comparing different mobilization schemes in the treatment of multiple myeloma and lymphomas to analyze their limitations and effectiveness in hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization for autologous transplant. This analysis showed that the addition of plerixafor to granulocyte colony stimulating factor is well tolerated and results in a greater proportion of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphomas or multiple myeloma reaching optimal CD34(+) cell collections with a smaller number of apheresis compared the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor alone.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 7 27%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 23%