↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of short-interfering RNAs treatment in experimental rabies due to wild-type virus

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of short-interfering RNAs treatment in experimental rabies due to wild-type virus
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bjid.2015.05.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camila Michele Appolinario, Susan Dora Allendorf, Marina Gea Peres, Clovis Reynaldo Fonseca, Acacia Ferreira Vicente, João Marcelo Azevedo de Paula Antunes, José Carlos Figueiredo Pantoja, Jane Megid

Abstract

We have evaluated the efficacy of short-interfering RNAs targeting the nucleoprotein gene and also the brain immune response in treated and non-treated infected mice. Mice were inoculated with wild-type virus, classified as dog (hv2) or vampire bat (hv3) variants and both groups were treated or leaved as controls. No difference was observed in the lethality rate between treated and non-treated groups, although clinical evaluation of hv2 infected mice showed differences in the severity of clinical disease (p=0.0006). Evaluation of brain immune response 5 days post-inoculation in treated hv2 group showed no difference among the analyzed genes, whereas after 10 days post-inoculation there was increased expression of 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase 1, tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin 12, interferon gamma, and C-X-C motif chemokine 10 associated with higher expression of N gene in the same period (p<0.0001). In hv2 non-treated group only higher interferon beta expression was found at day 5. The observed differences in results of the immune response genes between treated and non-treated groups is not promising as they had neither impact on mortality nor even a reduction in the expression of N gene in siRNA treated animals. This finding suggests that the use of pre-designed siRNA alone may not be useful in rabies treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 32%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Other 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#543
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,922
of 275,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.