↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic-driven antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients using the D-index and serial serum galactomannan testing

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic-driven antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients using the D-index and serial serum galactomannan testing
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.bjid.2016.04.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcia Garnica, Aline Sinhorelo, Laura Madeira, Rodrigo Portugal, Marcio Nucci

Abstract

Invasive mold disease (IMD) is an important complication of patients with hematologic malignancies, and is associated with high mortality. A diagnostic-driven approach has been an alternative to the classical empiric antifungal therapy. In the present study we tested an algorithm that incorporated risk stratification using the D-index, serial serum galactomannan (s-GMI) and CT-scan to guide the decision to start antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients. Between May 2010 and August 2012, patients with acute leukemia in induction remission were prospectively monitored from day 1 of chemotherapy until discharge or death with the D-index and s-GMI. Patients were stratified in low, intermediate and high risk according to the D-index and an extensive workup for IMD was performed in case of positive s-GMI (≥0.5), persistent fever, or the appearance of clinical manifestations suggestive of IMD. Among 29 patients, 6 (21%), 11 (38%), and 12 (41%) were classified as high, intermediate, and low risk, respectively. Workup for IMD was undertaken in 67%, 73% and 58% (p=0.77) of patients in each risk category, respectively, and antifungal therapy was given to 67%, 54.5%, and 17% (p=0.07). Proven or probable IMD was diagnosed in 67%, 45.5%, and in none (p=0.007) of high, intermediate, and low risk patients, respectively. All patients survived. A risk stratification using D-index was a useful instrument to be incorporated in IMD diagnostic approach, resulting in a more comprehensive antifungal treatment strategy, and to guide an earlier start of treatment in afebrile patients under very high risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 20%
Professor 4 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#645
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,269
of 355,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.