↓ Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of a novel drug elores (ceftriaxone+sulbactam+disodium edetate) in the management of multi-drug resistant bacterial infections in tertiary care centers: a post-marketing…

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and efficacy of a novel drug elores (ceftriaxone+sulbactam+disodium edetate) in the management of multi-drug resistant bacterial infections in tertiary care centers: a post-marketing surveillance study
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, April 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.02.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manu Chaudhary, Mohd Amin Mir, Shiekh Gazalla Ayub, for the Protocol 06 Group

Abstract

In India, elores (CSE-1034: ceftriaxone+sulbactam+disodium edetate) was approved as a broad spectrum antibiotic in year 2011 and is used for management of ESBL/MBL infections in tertiary care centers. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of this drug in patients with ESBL/MBL infections and identify the incidence of adverse events in real clinical settings. This PMS study was conducted at 17 centers across India and included 2500 patients of all age groups suffering from various bacterial infections and treated with CSE-1034. Information regarding demographic, clinical and microbiological parameters, dosage and treatment duration, efficacy and AEs associated with the treatment were recorded. A total of 2500 patients were included in the study and efficacy was evaluated in 2487 patients. In total, 409 AEs were reported in 211 (8.4%) patients. The major AEs reported were vomiting (3.0%), pain at injection site (2.5%), nausea (2.3%), redness at site (1.96%), thrombophlebitis (1.4%). Of total reported AEs, 40 (5.3%) AEs were reported in pediatric, 310 (20.6%) in adult, and 59 (23.6%) in geriatric group. No AE belonging to grade IV or V was reported in any patient. In terms of efficacy, 1977 (79.4%) patients were cured, 501 (20.1%) patients showed clinical improvement and 5 (0.2%) patients were complete failure. The treatment duration varied from 5 to 7 days in different patients depending on the infection type. In this post-marketing surveillance study, CSE-1034 was found to be an effective and safe option in management of patients with multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial infections under routine ward settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Other 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 26 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2020.
All research outputs
#17,072,409
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#385
of 815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,311
of 326,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 815 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.