↓ Skip to main content

Microbiology of organic and conventionally grown fresh produce

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 1,602)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
10 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Microbiology of organic and conventionally grown fresh produce
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Fresh produce is a generalized term for a group of farm-produced crops, including fruits and vegetables. Organic agriculture has been on the rise and attracting the attention of the food production sector, since it uses eco-agricultural principles that are ostensibly environmentally-friendly and provides products potentially free from the residues of agrochemicals. Organic farming practices such as the use of animal manure can however increase the risk of contamination by enteric pathogenic microorganisms and may consequently pose health risks. A number of scientific studies conducted in different countries have compared the microbiological quality of produce samples from organic and conventional production and results are contradictory. While some have reported greater microbial counts in fresh produce from organic production, other studies do not. This manuscript provides a brief review of the current knowledge and summarizes data on the occurrence of pathogenic microorganisms in vegetables from organic production.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Armenia 1 <1%
Unknown 233 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 16%
Student > Master 35 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Researcher 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 80 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 94 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,926,539
of 32,289,607 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#19
of 1,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,208
of 329,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,289,607 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,602 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.