↓ Skip to main content

Mosquito-transmitted viruses – the great Brazilian challenge

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 1,391)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mosquito-transmitted viruses – the great Brazilian challenge
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mânlio Tasso de Oliveira Mota, Ana Carolina Terzian, Maria Luana Cristiny Rodrigues Silva, Cássia Estofolete, Maurício Lacerda Nogueira

Abstract

Arboviruses pose a serious threat to public health worldwide, overloading the healthcare system and causing economic losses. These viruses form a very diverse group, and in Brazil, arboviruses belonging to the families Flaviviridae and Togaviridae are predominant. Unfortunately, the number of arboviruses increases in proportion with factors such as deforestation, poor sanitation, climate changes, and introduction of new viruses like Chikungunya virus and Zika virus. In Brazil, dengue is endemic, along with the presence of other arboviruses. The situation is complicated by the scarcity of diagnostic infrastructure and the absence of approved vaccines for these diseases. Disease control, thus, relies solely on vector control. Therefore, enhanced clinical knowledge and improved general awareness about these arboviruses are indispensable to tackle diagnostic inadequacies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 293 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 56 19%
Student > Master 55 18%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 58 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 73 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,178,214
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#42
of 1,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,143
of 322,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,391 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.