↓ Skip to main content

Tinnitus and sound intolerance: evidence and experience of a Brazilian group

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tinnitus and sound intolerance: evidence and experience of a Brazilian group
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.12.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tinnitus and sound intolerance are frequent and subjective complaints that may have an impact on a patient's quality of life. To present a review of the salient points including concepts, pathophysiology, diagnosis and approach of the patient with tinnitus and sensitivity to sounds. Literature review with bibliographic survey in Pubmed database. Articles and book chapters on tinnitus and sound sensitivity were selected. The several topics were discussed by a group of Brazilian professionals and the conclusions were described. The prevalence of tinnitus has increased over the years, often associated with hearing loss, metabolic factors and inadequate diet. Medical evaluation should be performed carefully to guide the request of subsidiary exams. Currently available treatments range from medications to the use of sounds with specific characteristics and meditation techniques, with variable results. A review on tinnitus and auditory sensitivity was presented, allowing the reader a broad view of the approach to these patients, based on scientific evidence and national experience.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 231 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 14%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Researcher 12 5%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 107 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 13%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 121 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2026.
All research outputs
#24,016,843
of 34,294,206 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#537
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#328,672
of 494,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,294,206 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.