↓ Skip to main content

Steroid vs. antibiotic impregnated absorbable nasal packing for wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Steroid vs. antibiotic impregnated absorbable nasal packing for wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.04.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Blazej Grzeskowiak, Malgorzata Wierzchowska, Rafal Walorek, Malgorzata Seredyka-Burduk, Katarzyna Wawrzyniak, Pawel Krzysztof Burduk

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 29 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 29 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#65
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,801
of 339,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.