↓ Skip to main content

Solitary plasmacytoma of the jaws: therapeutical considerations and prognosis based on a case reports systematic survey

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Solitary plasmacytoma of the jaws: therapeutical considerations and prognosis based on a case reports systematic survey
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.05.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduardo Madruga Lombardo, Fábio Luiz Dal Moro Maito, Cláiton Heitz

Abstract

Solitary plasmacytoma is a rare malignant tumor of plasma cells with no evidence of systemic proliferation. There are two known subtypes: extramedullary solitary plasmacytoma and solitary bone plasmacytoma. The etiology is still unknown. Both lesions present a risk of progression to multiple myeloma. A number of approaches have been used for treatment of solitary plasmacytoma. To carry out a systematic review of the case reports described in the literature, focusing on therapeutic and prognostic aspects. A search of clinical case reports was performed in the PubMed database using Mesh Terms related to "plasmacytoma" under the following criteria: type of study (case report), articles in English language, conducted in humans, with no publication date limits. Of the 216 articles found, only 21 articles met the pre-established inclusion criteria. The occurrence of solitary bone plasmacytoma in the bones of the face is a rare condition prevalent between the 4th and 6th decades of life, located in the posterior region of the mandible in most cases. Histopathological examination and systemic investigation are mandatory for confirmation of diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#378
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,450
of 341,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.