↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A stepwise diagnostic framework for recurrent unexplained fever in adults: an evidence-based review with focus on Latin America
Published in
Clinics, May 2026
DOI 10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.100992
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recurrent fever is a complex clinical presentation that poses significant diagnostic challenges, particularly when no clear etiology emerges despite extensive investigation. This integrative narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of recurrent fever and proposes a practical diagnostic flowchart focused on the most frequent etiologies, with particular emphasis on the Latin American and Brazilian contexts. Literature from MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, and SciELO was reviewed to summarize evidence on epidemiology, differential diagnosis, and diagnostic strategies. Recurrent fever may arise from infectious diseases, autoimmune or autoinflammatory disorders, malignancies, metabolic or occupational conditions, drug-induced etiologies, and factitious causes. Infections, notably tuberculosis, malaria, leishmaniasis, and endocarditis, remain leading contributors in developing countries. Non-infectious causes such as rheumatologic conditions, neoplasms, and inborn errors of immunity must also be considered, especially in persistent or unexplained cases. A structured, tiered approach to diagnosis is recommended, beginning with basic laboratory and imaging studies, progressing to targeted invasive procedures and advanced modalities such as 18F-FDG PET/CT, and, when appropriate, genomic sequencing. The flowchart proposed in this review emphasizes clinical history, frequent reassessment, and the judicious use of diagnostic resources to balance cost-effectiveness and diagnostic yield. Moreover, distinguishing between inflammatory and non-inflammatory patterns, as well as identifying the newly described Syndrome of Undifferentiated Recurrent Fever (SURF), may guide further evaluation. Ultimately, recurrent fever requires a systematic and multidisciplinary approach. Incorporating epidemiological context and advances in molecular and imaging technologies may improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2026.
All research outputs
#29,498,222
of 32,684,864 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#1,162
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,252
of 173,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,684,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.