↓ Skip to main content

Evaluación de la efectividad de un programa de mindfulness en profesionales de atención primaria

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluación de la efectividad de un programa de mindfulness en profesionales de atención primaria
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2013.04.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrés Martín Asuero, Teresa Rodríguez Blanco, Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera, Anna Berenguera, Jenny Moix Queraltó

Abstract

To determine the long-term effects of a mindfulness program on burnout, mood states, empathy, and mindfulness in primary care professionals. A repeated measures before-after study was performed in 87 participants working in primary care. The variables evaluated were scores of the Burnout Inventory (Maslach), mood states (Profile of Mood States [POMS]), empathy (Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy [JSPE]) and mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [FFMQ]), adherence to the intervention, and changes in attitudes. Evaluations were performed at baseline, at 8 weeks, and at 6 and 12 months. The intervention lasted for 1 year and consisted of two training phases, an intensive first phase lasting 28 hours, spread over 8 weeks, and a second, maintenance phase of 25 hours spread over 10 months. The effect of the intervention was assessed through observed change, standardized response mean (SRM), and linear mixed-effects models on repeated measures. The scores of all the scales improved significantly during the follow-up compared with baseline scores. The greatest differences were obtained at 12 months, especially in the the FFMQ (SRM: 1.4), followed by the POMS (SRM: 0,8). The greatest improvement in the maintenance phase was found in the difference between consecutive scores. The only scale that showed major changes in all phases was the FFMQ scale. At the end of the intervention, 89% of participants practiced the exercises of the program on their own and 94% reported improvements in self-care and greater professionalism. A psychoeducational program based on mindfulness reduces burnout and improves mood states, empathy, and mindfulness, while encouraging better self-care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 224 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 15%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 9%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 58 25%
Unknown 56 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 14%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 61 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,241,734
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#43
of 52 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,724
of 228,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them