↓ Skip to main content

Algo no estamos haciendo bien cuando informamos a los/las pacientes tras un evento adverso

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Algo no estamos haciendo bien cuando informamos a los/las pacientes tras un evento adverso
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.04.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Joaquín Mira, Susana Lorenzo

Abstract

To analyze which actions are carried out in hospitals and primary care to ensure open disclosure to the patient after an adverse event (AE). We surveyed 633 managers and patient safety coordinates (staff) and 1340 physicians and nurses from eight autonomous communities. The level of implementation of open disclosure recommendations was explored. A total of 112 (27.9%) staff and 386 (35.9%) professionals considered that patients were correctly informed after an EA; 30 (7.4%) staff claimed to have a guideline on how to report EA; only 92 medical professionals (17.4%) and 93 nurses (19.1%) had received training on open disclosure. There are gaps in the way of planning, organizing and ensuring that patients who suffer an AE will receive an apology with honest information about what has happened and what could subsequently happen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Professor 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 20 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Engineering 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 21 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,272,238
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#20
of 52 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,062
of 278,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.