↓ Skip to main content

El uso de Facebook en asociaciones españolas de enfermedades raras: ¿cómo y para qué lo utilizan?

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
El uso de Facebook en asociaciones españolas de enfermedades raras: ¿cómo y para qué lo utilizan?
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.05.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel Armayones, Samantha Requena, Beni Gómez-Zúñiga, Modesta Pousada, Antonio M. Bañón

Abstract

To study whether the use of Facebook is widespread in the field of patient associations for rare diseases and, if so, the purpose for which the site is being used. A descriptive study was conducted to determine whether associations within the Spanish Federation for Rare Diseases use Facebook and, if so, the type of use and its objectives. The analysis was performed based on a categorization system that has been used in the field of chronic diseases and has been adapted to the specific characteristics of rare diseases. Associations use Facebook to raise awareness of rare diseases in general and particularly to share content related to psychological, medical and social support, the promotion and dissemination of research, and fundraising. The alignment between the interests of associations through their presence on Facebook and policy areas of the national strategy for rare diseases is a reason for optimism about the feasibility of using Facebook as a tool for encounters and collaborative work.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 6 26%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,405,051
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#18
of 52 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,613
of 278,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them