↓ Skip to main content

Variaciones en el proceso de confirmación diagnóstica entre unidades de cribado poblacional de cáncer de mama

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variaciones en el proceso de confirmación diagnóstica entre unidades de cribado poblacional de cáncer de mama
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.03.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Natal, Ana Fernández-Somoano, Isabel Torá-Rocamora, Adonina Tardón, Xavier Castells, en nombre del grupo BELE

Abstract

To analyse variations in the diagnostic confirmation process between screening units, variations in the outcome of each episode and the relationship between the use of the different diagnostic confirmation tests and the lesion detection rate. Observational study of variability of the standardised use of diagnostic and lesion detection tests in 34 breast cancer mass screening units participating in early-detection programmes in three Spanish regions from 2002-2011. The diagnostic test variation ratio in percentiles 25-75 ranged from 1.68 (further appointments) to 3.39 (fine-needle aspiration). The variation ratio in detection rates of benign lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive cancer were 2.79, 1.99 and 1.36, respectively. A positive relationship between rates of testing and detection rates was found with fine-needle aspiration-benign lesions (R(2): 0.53), fine-needle aspiration-invasive carcinoma (R(2): 0 28), core biopsy-benign lesions (R(2): 0.64), core biopsy-ductal carcinoma in situ (R(2): 0.61) and core biopsy-invasive carcinoma (R(2): 0.48). Variation in the use of invasive tests between the breast cancer screening units participating in early-detection programmes was found to be significantly higher than variations in lesion detection. Units which conducted more fine-needle aspiration tests had higher benign lesion detection rates, while units that conducted more core biopsies detected more benign lesions and cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 35%
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Psychology 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 30%