You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Actitudes frente a la cultura de seguridad del paciente en el ámbito hospitalario y variables correlacionadas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gaceta Sanitaria, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.07.019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ramon Mir-Abellán, Anna Falcó-Pegueroles, María Luisa de la Puente-Martorell |
| Abstract |
To describe attitudes towards patient safety culture among workers in a hospital setting and determine the influence of socio-demographic and professional variables. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was distributed among a sample of professionals and nursing assistants. A dimension was considered a strength if positive responses exceeded 75% and an opportunity for improvement if more than 50% of responses were negative. 59% (n=123) of respondents rated safety between 7 and 8. 53% (n=103) stated that they had not used the notification system to report any incidents in the previous twelve months. The strength identified was "teamwork in the unit/service" and the opportunity for improvement was "staffing". A more positive attitude was observed in outpatient services and among nursing professionals and part-time staff. This study has allowed us to determine the rating of the hospital in patient safety culture. This is vital for developing improvement strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 22% |
| Unknown | 55 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 90 | 44% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 59 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2016.
All research outputs
#17,729,864
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#13
of 52 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,002
of 327,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.