Title |
Marcos GRADE de la evidencia a la decisión (EtD): un enfoque sistemático y transparente para tomar decisiones sanitarias bien informadas. 1: Introducción
|
---|---|
Published in |
Gaceta Sanitaria, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.02.010 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pablo Alonso-Coello, Holger J. Schünemann, Jenny Moberg, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Elie A. Akl, Marina Davoli, Shaun Treweek, Reem A. Mustafa, Gabriel Rada, Sarah Rosenbaum, Angela Morelli, Gordon H. Guyatt, Andrew D. Oxman, el GRADE Working Group |
Abstract |
Clinicians, guideline developers, and policymakers sometimes neglect important criteria, give undue weight to criteria, and do not use the best available evidence to inform their judgments. Explicit and transparent systems for decision making can help to ensure that all important criteria are considered and that decisions are informed by the best available research evidence. The GRADE Working Group has developed Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for the different type of recommendations or decisions. The purpose of EtD frameworks is to help people use evidence in a structured and transparent way to inform decisions in the context of clinical recommendations, coverage decisions, and health system or public health recommendations and decisions. EtD frameworks have a common structure that includes formulation of the question, an assessment of the evidence, and drawing conclusions, though there are some differences between frameworks for each type of decision. EtD frameworks inform users about the judgments that were made and the evidence supporting those judgments by making the basis for decisions transparent to target audiences. EtD frameworks also facilitate dissemination of recommendations and enable decision makers in other jurisdictions to adopt recommendations or decisions, or adapt them to their context. This article is a translation of the original article published in British Medical Journal. The EtD frameworks are currently used in the Clinical Practice Guideline Programme of the Spanish National Health System, co-ordinated by GuíaSalud. The Fundación Dr. Antonio Esteve has assumed the copyright license as well as the translation of the original article into Spanish. The translation was carried out by María Victoria Leo Rosas and proofread by Andrea Cervera and Pablo Alonso-Coello. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 20% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 17% |
Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 27 | 38% |