↓ Skip to main content

Psychopathology, quality of life, and related factors in children with celiac disease

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pediatria, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Psychopathology, quality of life, and related factors in children with celiac disease
Published in
Jornal de Pediatria, November 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2016.06.012
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study aimed to survey children with celiac disease (CD) for psychiatric disorders, determine the possible factors that predict psychopathology, and analyze health-related quality of life and possible factors that could affect the quality of life. In this study, all children completed the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children - Present and Lifetime Version - Turkish Version (K-SADS-PL-T), as well as the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) for the 8-12 age group, and a sentence completion test. A face-to-face interview was performed with the parents of the participants to inform them about the study. This study included 52 children with celiac disease in the age range of 8-12 years, and 40 healthy children. The mean age of the study group was 10.36±0.36 years, and 31 (59%) of them were females. The mean age of the control group was 10.35±0.46 years and 24 (60%) of them were females. The mean subscale scores of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory were significantly lower in children with celiac disease when compared to the control group (p<0.05). There was at least one psychiatric disorder in the 26 (50%) children with celiac disease. This study has shown once more that celiac disease is associated with some psychiatric signs/diagnoses, and that it decreased quality of life. Further studies are needed to determine the factors that could reduce the psychiatric signs. It is apparent that those studies would contribute new approaches to improve diagnosis, treatment, and quality of life.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 42 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Psychology 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 46 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#743
of 896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,109
of 415,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.