↓ Skip to main content

Role of serum (1,3)-β-d-glucan assay in early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in a neonatal intensive care unit

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pediatria, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of serum (1,3)-β-d-glucan assay in early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in a neonatal intensive care unit
Published in
Jornal de Pediatria, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2017.07.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abd Elazeez Shabaan, Lobna Mahmoud Elbaz, Wafaa M. El-Emshaty, Basma Shouman

Abstract

To study the microbiological pattern of late onset neonatal sepsis cultures and to assess the diagnostic performance of serum (1,3)-β-d-glucan level for early diagnosis of invasive fungemia in high-risk infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit. A prospective multicenter clinical trial conducted on infants at high risk for invasive fungal infections, with suspected late onset sepsis, admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit at Mansoura University Children's Hospital and Mansoura General Hospital between March 2014 and February 2016. A total of 77 newborn infants with high risk of invasive fungal infection were classified based on blood culture into three groups: no fungemia (41 neonates with proven bacterial sepsis), suspected fungemia (25 neonates with negative blood culture), and definite fungemia group (11 neonates with culture-proven Candida). The growing organisms were Klebsiella spp. (14/54); Escherichia coli (12/54); Staphylococcus spp. (12/54; coagulase-negative Staphylococcus [9/54]; Staphylococcus aureus [3/54]); Pseudomonas aerouginosa (3/54); and Proteus spp. (2/54). Moreover, 11/54 presented Candida. Serum (1,3)-β-d-glucan concentration was significantly lower in the no fungemia group when compared with the definite fungemia group. The best cut-off value of (1,3)-β-d-glucan was 99pg/mL with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 63.6%, 95.1%, 77.8%, 90.7%, and 88.5%, respectively. (1,3)-β-d-glucan assay has a limited sensitivity with excellent specificity and negative predictive value, which allow its use as an aid in exclusion of invasive neonatal fungal infection. Accurate diagnosis and therapeutic decisions should be based on combining (1,3)-β-d-glucan assay with other clinical, radiological, and microbiological findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 30 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 34 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,259,784
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#359
of 896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,576
of 336,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.