You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors associated with objectively measured total sedentary time and screen time in children aged 9–11 years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Jornal de Pediatria, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jped.2017.12.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerson Luis de Moraes Ferrari, Carlos Pires, Dirceu Solé, Victor Matsudo, Peter T. Katzmarzyk, Mauro Fisberg |
| Abstract |
To identify factors associated with total sedentary time and screen time in children aged 9-11 years. For seven consecutive days, 328 children (51.5% boys) used accelerometers to monitor total sedentary time. Screen time was calculated by the self-reporting method. Individual, family, family environment, and school environment questionnaires were filled out. Body composition was measured using a Tanita scale. The mean sedentary time was 500min/day (boys: 489, girls: 511, p=0.005), and mean screen time was 234min/day (boys: 246, girls: 222, p=0.053). In both genders, factors associated with sedentary time were healthy dietary pattern and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. In boys, only moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was significant; in girls, the healthy dietary pattern, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, and transportation to school were significant. As for the screen time, the associated factors were body mass index and healthy dietary pattern (both genders). In boys, the associated factors were body mass index, healthy dietary pattern, and television in the bedroom. In girls, the associated factors were healthy dietary pattern, transportation to school, and physical activity policies or practice at school. Several associated factors were identified in the association between total sedentary time and screen time in children; however, only the healthy dietary pattern was common between sedentary time and screen time. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 21% |
| Unknown | 54 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 16 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 59 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#744
of 897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#390,327
of 450,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.