You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Suaeda maritima-based herbal coils and green nanoparticles as potential biopesticides against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti and the tobacco cutworm Spodoptera litura
|
---|---|
Published in |
Physiological & Molecular Plant Pathology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.pmpp.2017.01.002 |
Authors |
Udaiyan Suresh, Kadarkarai Murugan, Chellasamy Panneerselvam, Rajapandian Rajaganesh, Mathath Roni, Al Thabiani Aziz, Hatem Ahmed Naji Al-Aoh, Subrata Trivedi, Hasibur Rehman, Suresh Kumar, Akon Higuchi, Angelo Canale, Giovanni Benelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 19% |
Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
Researcher | 12 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
Lecturer | 9 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 16% |
Unknown | 47 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 11% |
Chemistry | 9 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
Other | 22 | 15% |
Unknown | 54 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,185,927
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Physiological & Molecular Plant Pathology
#121
of 504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,647
of 449,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiological & Molecular Plant Pathology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 504 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.