You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementing a braided home-based parent-support curriculum: Lessons learned
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychosocial Intervention, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.psi.2017.03.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate Guastaferro, Katy Miller, John R. Lutzker, Daniel James Whitaker, Jenelle Shanley Chatham, Betty S. Lai, Allison Kemner |
| Abstract |
A singular parent-support program is limited in its ability to address multiple child and family needs. One innovative solution is braiding, a process in which two evidence-based programs are systematically combined as a newly tailored, cohesive curriculum. In this paper we describe the systematic braiding of two parent-support curricula, Parents as Teachers® and SafeCare®. We highlight implementation challenges to inform future planning and braiding efforts. Based on qualitative data (n = 13), we discuss five lessons learned, including identifying a pedagogical approach and sustainability at the model- and site-level. Implications and future directions for braiding and implementation are also discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Librarian | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2017.
All research outputs
#6,965,122
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Psychosocial Intervention
#37
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,789
of 324,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychosocial Intervention
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.