↓ Skip to main content

Neumonía por Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Argentina de Microbiología, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 327)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neumonía por Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum
Published in
Revista Argentina de Microbiología, November 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ram.2016.05.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Furiasse, Ana M. Gasparotto, Aída Monterisi, Gabriela Castellano, Marta Rocchi

Abstract

Microorganisms of the genera Corynebacterium, specie pseudodiphtheriticum are a part of the indigenous microbiota of human skin and oropharinx. Nevertheless in recent decades these bacilli are emerging as opportunistic pathogens causing clinically significant infections in patients with previous compromise. We report the case of a 76 years old female patient, with a history of hypertension, hypothyroidism, type 2 diabetes and chronic renal failure, who presented pneumonia during their stay at the intensive care unit. The induced sputum revealed a representative sample with monomicrobial gram positive pleomorphic coryneform rods (Gram stain) and cultures demonstrated the presence of C. pseudodiphtheriticum as the only bacteria recovered. The pacient received an empirical third generation cephalosporin medication with a succesfull recovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Argentina de Microbiología
#31
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,193
of 319,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Argentina de Microbiología
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.