↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome using local anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition), January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome using local anesthesia
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition), January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.12.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Felipe Francisco Honorato Barros, Aurimar da Rocha Luz Júnior, Bruno Roncaglio, Célio Pinheiro Queiróz Júnior, Marcelo Fernandes Tribst

Abstract

To evaluate the results and complications from surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by means of an open route, using a local anesthesia technique comprising use of a solution of lidocaine, epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate. This was a cohort study conducted through evaluating the medical files of 16 patients who underwent open surgery to treat carpal tunnel syndrome, with use of local anesthesia consisting of 20 mL of 1% lidocaine, adrenaline at 1:100,000 and 2 mL of sodium bicarbonate. The DASH scores before the operation and six months after the operation were evaluated. Comparisons were made regarding the intensity of pain at the time of applying the anesthetic and during the surgical procedure, and in relation to other types of procedure. The DASH score improved from 65.17 to 16.53 six months after the operation (p < 0.01). In relation to the anesthesia, 75% of the patients reported that this technique was better than or the same as venous puncture and 81% reported that it was better than a dental procedure. Intraoperative pain occurred in two cases. There were no occurrences of ischemia. Use of local anesthesia for surgically treating carpal tunnel syndrome is effective for performing the procedure and for the final result.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Other 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 65%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%