↓ Skip to main content

Rehabilitation of hamstring muscle injuries: a literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition), December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 190)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
413 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rehabilitation of hamstring muscle injuries: a literature review
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition), December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.12.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hamstring injuries are among the most frequent in sports. The high relapse rate is a challenge for sports medicine and has a great impact on athletes and sport teams. The treatment goal is to provide the athlete the same functional level as before the injury. Thus, functional rehabilitation is very important to the success of the treatment. Currently, several physical therapy modalities are used, according to the stage of the lesion, such as cryotherapy, laser therapy, therapeutic ultrasound, therapeutic exercise, and manual therapy. However, the evidence of the effectiveness of these modalities in muscle injuries is not fully established due to the little scientific research on the topic. This article presents an overview of the physiotherapy approach in the rehabilitation of hamstring muscle injuries.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 409 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 108 26%
Student > Master 47 11%
Student > Postgraduate 28 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 39 9%
Unknown 157 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 76 18%
Sports and Recreations 75 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 73 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Social Sciences 4 <1%
Other 12 3%
Unknown 166 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,482,426
of 28,815,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)
#7
of 190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,065
of 423,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,815,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.