↓ Skip to main content

Quality of life and functional capacity of patients with adhesive capsulitis: identifying risk factors associated to better outcomes after treatment with nerve blocking

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition), September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of life and functional capacity of patients with adhesive capsulitis: identifying risk factors associated to better outcomes after treatment with nerve blocking
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition), September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.rbre.2017.05.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcos Rassi Fernandes, Maria Alves Barbosa, Ruth Minamisawa Faria

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to assess the quality of life and functional capacity of adhesive capsulitis patients at the beginning and end of procedure and to identify risk factors associated to better outcomes after treatment with nerve blocking. A prospective cohort study was performed. Inclusion criteria were clinical signs of adhesive capsulitis and disease changes on shoulder imaging exams. The short form of World Health Organization Quality of life and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaires were administered at the beginning and end of treatment. A score of 55 points or more on the Constant index was used for discontinuation of treatment. We used the Wilcoxon test for paired samples. Multiple regression analysis of Poisson was carried out using exposure variables with p<0.20 in the univariate analysis and the satisfactory quality of life and better functional capability as outcomes. The significance level was 5%. 43 patients were evaluated. For the comparison between medians values at the beginning and end of treatment (physical domain: 46.43-67.86; psychologic domain: 66.67-79.17; social domain: 66.67-75; environment domain: 62.5-68.75; DASH: 64.16-38.33), p was <0.05. Aging (physical/psychologic/DASH), higher educational level (physical/environment/DASH), less severity (only physical) and fewer nerve blocking (only psychologic) were these independent risk factors. Quality of life and functional capacity of the patients improve at the end of procedure. Older patients and higher education levels are the risk factors most associated to satisfactory quality of life and better functional capacity after treatment with nerve blocking.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Postgraduate 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 19%
Engineering 3 5%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 23 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2017.
All research outputs
#23,320,957
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition)
#55
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,521
of 328,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition)
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.