↓ Skip to main content

New guidelines for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition), August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 101)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
New guidelines for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition), August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.rbre.2017.07.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To establish guidelines based on scientific evidence for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia. Evidence collection was performed based on 9 questions regarding the diagnosis of fibromyalgia, structured using the Patient, Intervention or Indicator, Comparison and Outcome (P.I.C.O.), with searches in the main, primary databases of scientific information. After defining the potential studies to support the recommendations, they were graded according to evidence and degree of recommendation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 206 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 16%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 9 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 92 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 12%
Psychology 6 3%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 92 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2025.
All research outputs
#6,045,492
of 32,013,898 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition)
#14
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,524
of 345,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition)
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,013,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.