You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mejoramiento de los procesos en el quirófano mediante la aplicación de la metodología Lean de Toyota
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología (Wolters Kluwer), July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.rca.2014.02.007 |
| Authors |
Lynn D. Martin, Sally E. Rampersad, Daniel K.W. Low, Mark A. Reed |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,857,628
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología (Wolters Kluwer)
#12
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,648
of 242,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología (Wolters Kluwer)
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them