↓ Skip to main content

Deficiência de vitamina D na gravidez e o seu impacto sobre o feto, o recém‐nascido e na infância

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Paulista de Pediatria, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 529)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Deficiência de vitamina D na gravidez e o seu impacto sobre o feto, o recém‐nascido e na infância
Published in
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, February 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.rpped.2014.05.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) in pregnant women and their children is an important health problem with severe consequences for the health of both. Thus, the objectives of this review were to reassess the magnitude and consequences of VDD during pregnancy, lactation and infancy, associated risk factors, prevention methods, and to explore epigenetic mechanisms in early fetal life capable of explaining many of the non-skeletal benefits of vitamin D (ViD).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 16%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 4%
Researcher 9 4%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 90 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 95 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,201,674
of 27,703,685 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#6
of 529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,183
of 368,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,703,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 529 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.