You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Babies' Portal Website Hearing Aid Section: Assessment by Audiologists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1055/s-0034-1368139 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bárbara Guimarães Bastos, Deborah Viviane Ferrari |
| Abstract |
Introduction The family has ultimate responsibility for decisions about the use and care during the daily routine and problem solving in the manipulation of hearing aids (HA) in infants and children. Objective The purpose of the study was to assess technical and content quality of Babies' Portal website Hearing Aid section by audiologists. Methods Letters and e-mails were sent inviting professionals to surf the website and anonymously fill out an online form with 58 questions covering demographic data as well as the website's technical (Emory questionnaire with the subscales of accuracy, authorship, updates, public, navigation, links, and structure) and content quality. Results A total of 109 professionals (tree men and 106 women) with mean age of 31.6 years participated in the study. Emory percentage scores ranged from 90.1 to 96.7%. The Hearing Aid section contents were considered good or very good. Conclusion The website was deemed to have good technical and content quality, being suitable to supplement informational counseling to parents of hearing-impaired children fitted with hearing aids. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 22% |
| Psychology | 7 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,211,562
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#58
of 645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,271
of 223,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#4
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 645 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.