↓ Skip to main content

Unión cráneo-cervical – anatomía normal y correlación con imágenes

Overview of attention for article published in Argentinian Journal of Radiology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unión cráneo-cervical – anatomía normal y correlación con imágenes
Published in
Argentinian Journal of Radiology, July 2018
DOI 10.1055/s-0038-1656541
Authors

Nicolás Sgarbi, Osmar Telis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Unknown 9 82%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Argentinian Journal of Radiology
#6
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,616
of 340,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Argentinian Journal of Radiology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 37 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them