You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Characterizing two models for abortion care in Argentina pre-Law 27.610: 2016-2019.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista de Saúde Pública, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004993 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Erika E Atienzo, Belén Grosso, Ruth Zurbriggen, David Zambrano, María Vivas, Brianna Keefe-Oates, Caitlin Gerdts, Alexandra Wollum |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 29% |
Student > Master | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,544,090
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Saúde Pública
#280
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,301
of 377,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Saúde Pública
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.