↓ Skip to main content

Fatores associados ao custo do cuidado à crise de saúde mental infantojuvenil no Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Saúde Pública, April 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fatores associados ao custo do cuidado à crise de saúde mental infantojuvenil no Brasil
Published in
Revista de Saúde Pública, April 2026
DOI 10.11606/s1518-8787.2026060007306
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To identify the sociodemographic and clinical variables that influenced the daily costs of children and adolescents who stayed overnight in Type III Centro de Atenção Psicossocial Infantojuvenil (CAPSij - Child and Adolescent Psychosocial Care Center) or in hospital reference or emergency and urgent care from the perspective of society in the year 2023. This is a retrospective cost analysis. Direct and indirect costs were collected. A mixed technique was used to measure costs, prioritizing the micro-costing approach and the bottom-up method for valuation. Factors influencing costs were evaluated using univariate statistical models. The study included 399 users. The average total cost was R$ 6,704.38 (US$ 1,149.99) and the average daily cost was R$ 1,097.97 (US$ 188.33). There was statistical significance in the correlation between daily cost and age, race, diagnostic subgroup, referral to the service, and reason for seeking care. The variable with the greatest positive variation in daily cost was seeking care for drug use (R$ 125.82; US$ 21.58), while the variable with the greatest negative variation in daily cost was being referred by another service (R$ 139.86; US$ 23.99). To make more efficient use of available resources, it is up to the child and adolescent mental health care network to invest in the early care of children and adolescents, especially those who are most vulnerable and who may have problems with drug use, and to increasingly encourage coordination between services.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 50%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 50%
Sports and Recreations 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2026.
All research outputs
#8,932,556
of 32,916,726 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Saúde Pública
#261
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,900
of 339,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Saúde Pública
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,916,726 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them