↓ Skip to main content

Bufotenine is able to block rabies virus infection in BHK-21 cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 545)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bufotenine is able to block rabies virus infection in BHK-21 cells
Published in
Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1678-9199-20-45
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Rabies is a fatal zoonotic neglected disease that occurs in more than 150 countries, and kills more than 55.000 people every year. It is caused by an enveloped single stranded RNA virus that affects the central nervous system, through an infection initiated by the muscular nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, according to many authors. Alkaloids, such as acetylcholine, are widespread molecules in nature. They are present in numerous biological fluids, including the skin secretion of many amphibians, in which they act (together with proteins, peptides and steroids) as protection agents against predators and/or microorganisms. Among those amphibians that are rich in alkaloids, there is the genus Rhinella.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Nigeria 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 20%
Chemistry 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 28 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2026.
All research outputs
#2,583,730
of 32,718,554 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
#28
of 545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,487
of 289,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,718,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.