↓ Skip to main content

Snakebite envenomation turns again into a neglected tropical disease!

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 551)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
721 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Snakebite envenomation turns again into a neglected tropical disease!
Published in
Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40409-017-0127-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

On June 9(th), 2017 WHO categorized snakebite envenomation into the Category A of the Neglected Tropical Diseases. This new situation will allow access to new funding, paving the way for wider and deeper researches. It should also expand the accessibility of antivenoms. Let us hope that it also leads to cooperation among stakeholders, aiming at improving the management of snakebites in developing countries.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 721 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 721 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 110 15%
Student > Master 97 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 6%
Researcher 43 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 5%
Other 83 12%
Unknown 307 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 95 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 72 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 35 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 3%
Other 98 14%
Unknown 329 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2026.
All research outputs
#1,497,732
of 33,704,742 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
#15
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,623
of 354,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,704,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them