↓ Skip to main content

Web Search Queries Can Predict Stock Market Volumes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Web Search Queries Can Predict Stock Market Volumes
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0040014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We live in a computerized and networked society where many of our actions leave a digital trace and affect other people's actions. This has lead to the emergence of a new data-driven research field: mathematical methods of computer science, statistical physics and sociometry provide insights on a wide range of disciplines ranging from social science to human mobility. A recent important discovery is that search engine traffic (i.e., the number of requests submitted by users to search engines on the www) can be used to track and, in some cases, to anticipate the dynamics of social phenomena. Successful examples include unemployment levels, car and home sales, and epidemics spreading. Few recent works applied this approach to stock prices and market sentiment. However, it remains unclear if trends in financial markets can be anticipated by the collective wisdom of on-line users on the web. Here we show that daily trading volumes of stocks traded in NASDAQ-100 are correlated with daily volumes of queries related to the same stocks. In particular, query volumes anticipate in many cases peaks of trading by one day or more. Our analysis is carried out on a unique dataset of queries, submitted to an important web search engine, which enable us to investigate also the user behavior. We show that the query volume dynamics emerges from the collective but seemingly uncoordinated activity of many users. These findings contribute to the debate on the identification of early warnings of financial systemic risk, based on the activity of users of the www.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Italy 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Switzerland 3 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 278 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 16%
Researcher 39 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 65 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 63 21%
Computer Science 50 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 37 12%
Physics and Astronomy 19 6%
Engineering 12 4%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 72 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#823,331
of 34,539,236 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,996
of 225,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,579
of 214,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#118
of 4,328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,539,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.